
Upload your EDR package
LightBox, EDR, ERIS, and Banks are supported. Drop the ZIP file in.
AI-assisted Phase I ESA report generation
Purpose-built for the senior EP who signs the report. Ingest your EDR package, generate an ASTM E1527-21 draft, and get a document that reads like your firm wrote it.
In private beta with senior EPs across California, Texas, and Florida.
The subject property was reviewed across available historical sources. Each statement below is linked to its underlying source record.
A typical Phase I takes 6–8 hours of writing on top of the site visit and records review. On a busy week, that is the difference between two reports and five.
Rush jobs pay more. Most small firms cannot take them because report writing—not fieldwork—is the bottleneck.
When your team is at capacity, Phase I work goes to a competitor. That is not just a lost report; it is a lost client relationship.
The product lives in the drafting window. Job intake, EDR ordering, the site visit, firm QA/QC, and client delivery remain in your existing workflow.

LightBox, EDR, ERIS, and Banks are supported. Drop the ZIP file in.

Photos, interviews, field notes, and voice memos from the site visit.

Full sections, tables, figures, historical use, findings, REC analysis, and conclusions.

You are the EP. Nothing is submitted or shared without your review and certification.
The system structures available evidence into your firm’s report format. Source-based narrative is drafted; professional opinions and final classifications remain review items for the EP.
What stays yours
This tool drafts. You review, edit, and certify. Every REC determination, every professional opinion, and every conclusion passes under your judgment before the report is delivered.
The output is a draft—a very good draft—but it is a draft.
Your ASTM E1527-21 obligations as the Environmental Professional remain unchanged. The system supports the work; it does not replace the judgment.
Firm-specific output
Upload three to five recent Phase I reports during onboarding. The system captures the patterns your team already uses and applies them consistently to each new draft.
Reports read like they came out of your office because your templates, standards, and review preferences remain the basis of the document.
Questions senior EPs ask
A drafting system should earn trust with traceability, explicit limits, and predictable exception handling.
General-purpose language models do not parse EDR packages or structure work around ASTM E1527-21. This system maps the actual source materials consultants use into a report workflow with citations, review states, and explicit gaps.
The EP signing the report remains responsible. Your review is the quality gate—the same role you hold today when a junior staff member drafts a section for you.
Every factual claim is cited to the underlying package or uploaded material. Every REC analysis includes a rationale. Unsupported claims surface as review items or data gaps.
Sparse records, conflicting historical uses, unclear tank status, incomplete interviews, and other exceptions are surfaced for EP judgment rather than smoothed into unsupported narrative.
No charge for parsing supported EDR packages, revisions, template updates, onboarding, training, or future ASTM standard updates.
At the Standard rate, drafting costs less than one-sixth of a typical $375 EDR package. Any savings claim should still be validated against your firm’s actual workflow.
No pitch deck
See it work on a real Phase I. Bring an EDR package for a site of your choosing; we will walk through the draft and answer specific questions about your firm’s edge cases.
No sales pressure. Two professionals talking about Phase I workflow.